EEOC Sues Chick-fil-A Franchise Over Religious Accommodation Failure

By: Sonal Shah, JD, Assistant Director, Employment Law Services
Published July 21, 2026

Recently, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a lawsuit against a Chick-fil-A franchise, alleging that the franchise failed to accommodate a Christian employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs. The lawsuit comes as the agency has identified religious discrimination and accommodation issues among its enforcement priorities.

According to the EEOC, an applicant informed the franchise during the hiring process that, as a member of the United Church of God, she observes the Sabbath on Saturdays and could not work that day. The franchise initially agreed to the accommodation and hired the employee as a fleet supervisor with Saturdays off.

Several months later, however, the franchise allegedly asked the employee to work Saturdays and informed her that if she could not, she would be demoted to a non-supervisory position with lower pay, reduced benefits, and fewer hours. The EEOC’s lawsuit stated that the employee proposed several alternative accommodations that would have allowed her to remain in her position while observing the Sabbath. The franchise rejected all the proposed options and ultimately terminated her employment.

While the Chick-fil-A franchise denies wrongdoing and the allegations remain unproven, the case offers several important reminders for employers.

Begin with a Collaborative Mindset
Approach every accommodation request with the assumption that a reasonable solution may exist. Although the formal "interactive process" is most commonly associated with disability accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), employers should take a similarly collaborative approach when evaluating religious accommodation requests. Engage employees in good-faith discussions, fully explore alternative solutions if the requested accommodation is not feasible, and document all conversations.

Notably, following the Supreme Court's 2023 decision in Groff v. DeJoy, employers generally must reasonably accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs and practices unless doing so would create an undue hardship (i.e., a substantial increased cost or burden on business operations). If you believe no reasonable accommodation exists, consult employment counsel before making a final decision. A flexible, solution-oriented approach can reduce legal risk while reinforcing an inclusive workplace culture.

Reversing an Existing Accommodation Carries Significant Risk
One of the most notable aspects of this case is that the employer reportedly granted the accommodation before later withdrawing it. When an employer has successfully accommodated a religious practice for a period of time, it becomes more difficult to argue that continuing it creates an undue hardship. Before modifying or ending an accommodation, carefully evaluate what business circumstances have changed and whether those changes justify the decision. Organizations should also consult employment counsel before terminating an existing accommodation, particularly one that has been in place for an extended period.

Evaluate Sincerity, Not Theology
Employers should avoid evaluating whether an employee's religious beliefs align with traditional religious practices or official doctrine. The relevant question is generally whether the employee’s belief is sincerely held. A belief does not need to be widely practiced, endorsed by religious leaders, or required by a particular faith tradition to qualify for protection.

For that reason, employers should be cautious about requesting documentation substantiating the employee’s belief and need for accommodation unless there is a legitimate reason to question the sincerity of the request. Even then, consulting legal counsel is best before proceeding.

Remember that Religious Accommodations Take Many Forms
Time off on specific days is often common, but religious accommodations may include:

• Flexible scheduling for worship-related practices, services, or events.
• Prayer breaks or designated prayer space.
• Modifications to dress codes or uniform requirements, including religious head coverings or jewelry.
• Grooming exceptions.
• Dietary accommodations at employer-sponsored events.
• Changes to job duties.

HR leaders and managers should understand the broad range of religious accommodation requests they may receive and consider each request individually.

Key Takeaway
This case underscores the importance of evaluating religious accommodation requests carefully, maintaining an open dialogue with employees, and documenting decision-making throughout the process.

As religious accommodation standards continue to evolve, employers should ensure HR leaders and managers are trained to recognize requests, engage in good-faith discussions, and seek legal guidance before denying or withdrawing an accommodation. Taking a thoughtful, individualized approach not only helps organizations comply with the law, but also strengthens employee trust, inclusion, and retention.

HR Source members with questions should contact the HR Hotline Online or call 800-448-4584 to speak with a member of our team.